Truck or Alien Craft? Meteor Signal Debunked, Leaving Researchers Baffled

Truck or Alien Craft? Meteor Signal Debunked, Leaving Researchers Baffled

Truck or Alien Craft? Meteor Signal Debunked, Leaving Researchers Baffled

Sound waves thought to be from a 2014 meteor fireball in northern Papua New Guinea were the vibrations of a truck rumbling down a nearby road, a new Johns Hopkins University-led study has revealed. The finding raises questions about the alien material widely reported from meteors pulled from the ocean last year.

The study is the first to show that the meteor’s surface is not a “meteor,” says Benjamin Fernando, a planetary seismologist at Johns Hopkins University who led the study. It’s really hard to get a signal and be sure it’s not due to something else. But what we can do is show that there are a lot of these signals, that they have all the features you would expect in an orbit, and none of the features you would expect in a meteor.”



The team plans to present their findings at the Lunar and Planetary Science Conference in Houston on March 12. Journalists can attend the presentation, which begins at 4:50 p.m. ET, in person or virtually.

In January 2014, after a meteorite entered the Earth’s atmosphere over the western Pacific Ocean, events related to ground vibrations recorded at a seismic station on Manus Island, Papua New Guinea; in 2023, material on the ocean floor near where the meteorite fragments were thought to have fallen was confirmed to be of “extraterrestrial technology” (alien) origin The material was confirmed to be of “extraterrestrial technology” (alien) origin.

However, according to Fernando, this speculation was based on a false interpretation, and the meteorite actually entered the atmosphere at a different location. Fernando’s team has found no evidence of seismic waves from the meteorite.

The location of the fireball was actually very far from where the marine expedition went to retrieve this meteorite fragment,” he says. They not only used the wrong signal, they were looking in the wrong place,” he says.

Using data from stations in Australia and Palau designed to detect sound waves from nuclear tests, Fernando’s team pinpointed the most likely location, more than 100 miles from where the meteorite was first studied. They concluded that the material recovered from the seafloor was either small, ordinary meteorites or particles from other meteorites that had hit the surface and mixed with surface contamination.

Whatever was found on the seafloor, whether it was a natural space rock or part of an alien spacecraft, had nothing to do with this meteorite,” Fernando said.

Fernando’s team includes Konstantinos Charalambas of Imperial College London, Steve Desch of Arizona State University, Alan Jackson of Towson University, Pierrick Mialle of the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty Organization, Eleanor K. Sansom, and Yoran Ekstrom of Columbia University, among others.

Source: Truck or Alien Craft? Meteor Signal Debunked, Leaving Researchers Baffled

Instead Of Preserving The Dead, Formaldehyde On Mars Could Have Started Life

Instead Of Preserving The Dead, Formaldehyde On Mars Could Have Started Life

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Çok Okunan Yazılar