No Big Bang? A Theory of Repeating Bursts Could Explain Everything
A bold new theory suggests the universe didn’t begin with a single Big Bang, but instead unfolds through a series of ultra-fast, invisible bursts called “temporal singularities.”
These fleeting events flood space with energy and matter, forming the galaxies and structures we see today — without needing dark matter or dark energy. The model challenges long-held cosmological assumptions and offers a fresh explanation for the universe’s expansion, proposing that these singularities, although unobservable, may be the true drivers of cosmic evolution.
Singularity-Driven Expansion Framework
Dr. Richard Lieu, a physics professor at The University of Alabama in Huntsville (UAH), has published a new paper in Classical and Quantum Gravity that offers an alternative explanation for the expansion of the universe. Instead of a single Big Bang, his model proposes that the cosmos evolves through a series of discrete events called “temporal singularities” — brief, universe-wide bursts of energy and matter.
This new framework eliminates the need for dark matter and dark energy to explain why the universe is expanding and how galaxies and other structures form.
The paper builds on Lieu’s earlier model, published in 2024, which proposed that gravity might exist without mass. That theory attracted over 41,000 reads and numerous citations. The updated version, while building on the same foundation, introduces significant changes.
“This new paper proposes an improved version of the earlier model, which is also radically different,” Lieu explains. “The new model can account for both structure formation and stability, and the key observational properties of the expansion of the universe at large, by enlisting density singularities in time that uniformly affect all space to replace conventional dark matter and dark energy.”
Transient Temporal Singularities Explained
Lieu’s improved model doesn’t rely on exotic phenomena like “negative mass” or “negative density” to work. The theory offers instead the notion that the universe is expanding due to a series of step-like bursts called “transient temporal singularities” that flood the entire cosmos with matter and energy, yet happen so rapidly, they cannot be observed as these singularities wink in and out of existence.
“Sir Fred Hoyle opposed Big Bang cosmology and postulated a ‘steady state’ model of the universe in which matter and energy were constantly being created as the universe expands,” Lieu notes. “But that hypothesis violates the law of mass-energy conservation. In the current theory, the conjecture is for matter and energy to appear and disappear in sudden bursts and, interestingly enough, there is no violation of conservation laws. These singularities are unobservable because they occur rarely in time and are unresolvedly fast, and that could be the reason why dark matter and dark energy have not been found. The origin of these temporal singularities is unknown – safe to say that the same is true of the moment of the Big Bang itself.”
These singularities in space in lieu of dark matter also generate something called “negative pressure,” a type of energy density, like that of dark energy, that has a repulsive gravitational effect, causing the universe to expand at an accelerating rate.
Negative Pressure and Accelerating Cosmos
“An example is the negative pressure exerted by a magnetic field along a field line,” Lieu says. “Einstein also postulated negative pressure in his 1917 paper on the Cosmological Constant. When positive mass-energy density is combined with negative pressure, there are some restrictions which ensure the mass-energy density remains positive with respect to any uniformly moving observer, so the negative density assumption is avoided in the new model.”
The title of Lieu’s new paper – Are dark matter and dark energy omnipresent? – hints at the researcher’s ultimate conclusions: “They are not omnipresent – meaning, not present at all times,” the researcher says. “They only appear in brief instances during which the matter and energy do fill the entire universe uniformly, apart from random spatial density variations which grow to form bound structures like galaxies. In between which they are not to be found anywhere. The only difference between this work and the standard model is that the temporal singularity occurred only once in the latter, but more than once in the former.”
Looking to the future of his research, Lieu says the next step to validating his model of the cosmos could come through observations using earthbound instruments rather than something like the James Webb Space Telescope.
“The best way to look for the proposed effect is actually to use a large ground-based telescope – like the Keck Observatory in Waimea, Hawaii, or the Isaac Newton Group of Telescopes in La Palma, Spain – to perform deep field observations, the data of which would be ‘sliced’ according to redshift,” the researcher notes. “Given sufficient redshift (or, equivalently, time) resolution effected by the redshift slicing, one might just find that the Hubble diagram exhibits jumps in the redshift distance relation, which would be very revealing.”